![](http://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/S3d7861d6b3994aeab3ede86c3b64996aw.jpg_80x80.jpg")
Is nothing sacred? If anything is, the delight of drawing a little creature is one of our strongest contenders. Let’s do a little experiment. Grab a pencil or pen, open up a new tab, Google “Pikachu,” and draw that little guy. It doesn’t have to be good; it’s just for you. That joy we’re feeling? That’s what some entrants in a recent Pokémon TCG art contest were being accused of denying themselves by submitting AI-generated images and occupying finalist slots that could’ve gone to artists who hand-drew (or hand-sculpted!) their work.
Yesterday, the official Pokémon TCG Twitter account released a statement saying that “select entrants from the top 300 finalists of the Pokémon TCG Illustration Contest 2024 have violated the official contest rules.” Those entrants, the statement says, have been disqualified and will be replaced with other artists who’d submitted entries.
While the statement doesn’t specify what contest rules were violated, a quick look at the replies to the reveal of the original 300 finalists on June 14 provide a potential explanation. A significant amount of the artwork submitted by those 300 finalists, in the words of Twitter user @CheezBurgrLuvr, seemed to “have that ai stank to them.”
I hate to make claims without concrete proof but these 2 pieces have that ai stank to them…. pic.twitter.com/21IDsXB9B8June 14, 2024
Users noted that a number of entries had that hard-to-quantify but distinct AI weirdness to them, and started posting results from AI content detection services like Hive. While services like Hive are by no means infallible, many of the submissions that failed that sniff test also happened to be submitted under conspicuously similar names: first name Vigen or Vigo, last name K or Khachadoorian.
Hey it looks like several GenAI Art submissions, likely from a single person, got through to the final round. Really ought to be disqualified. pic.twitter.com/R7UG6TbjqCJune 14, 2024
So why are you letting people violate the max entry rule so blatantly and with entries that are very likely ai generated? pic.twitter.com/rpHDm77fZvJune 14, 2024
I took a quick look at the TCG art contest submission guidelines, and while they forbid “material that violates or infringes another’s rights,” including intellectual property rights, I didn’t catch anything explicitly forbidding generative AI art imagery. They do, however, limit an artist to three submissions, which in itself is probably enough to disqualify the scoundrel known as Vigo K.
While Pokémon is a particularly tragic venue for the ongoing concerns with AI-generated imagery, this is nowhere near the first time art contests have been derailed by machine-made submissions. In April 2023, after winning a celebrated photography contest with a generated image, German artist Boris Elgadsen refused the award to indicate that, hey, maybe this stuff’s getting a bit off the rails, yeah? Since then, it’s gotten even goofier: Earlier this month, a photographer was disqualified from an AI photography contest for submitting an actual photo, because we’re in a bizarro nonsense future.
In the meantime, let me extend an early congratulations to whichever artists The Pokémon Company selects as the new finalists. I’m rooting for the hand-sculpted Charizard:
I didn’t make the top 300, so guess I can share my entry now? Handmade Charizard in clay, my first ever clay sculpture too! ☺️ pic.twitter.com/2v4ipsYDG0June 14, 2024
![](http://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/S878c16191ed94b3ca1e6676f14f2c9704.jpg_80x80.jpg")
